AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
67 thunderbird bolt pattern11/13/2023 NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver It was a low performance engine that was ultimately used in the 67 Shelby GT-500.īoth T-Bird engines came with Autolite carbs only. There was a "Q" code 428 option and it had 14 bolt exhaust manifolds. 486 lift camshaft.Īlthough there may be some validity to Gary's statement about the cylinder heads, I have never seen those heads on any 390 other than a S code. S code engines had Holley carbs and a huge. I am looking for information concerning factory performance/aftermarket speed parts (1958/1960) used on the MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) (Also Thunderbird 59/60) Engine Series (383-410-430-462) produced from 1958 thru 1968. Previous Discussion of FE 14 Hole Cyl Head Exhaust Port. and see how the heads were designed for runners and valve size. So one would actually have to go by the head casting I.D. Depending on the head casting, some had the extra bosses for the additional bolt holes but were not drilled if they were not going into an intermediate engine asm. During this period, (some) cylinder heads were machined (14 exhaust bolt) either for full frame cars or the intermediates. Topic: Did the 67 T-bird have a S-code engine in it?ĭid the 67 T-bird have a S-code engine in it? I saw a 67 T-bird yesterday that had a S-code intake with the C7AE-E casting on it but the heads did not have the bolt pattern like the Mustangs and Fairlanes.Ħ8 J-code(now 289) Cp Sprint"B" C4/3L00-9" PDB PS AC Profile | register | preferences | faq | search Please notice this is a brand new message board, and you must re-register to gain access.ĭid the 67 T-bird have a S-code engine in it? Please join us at our NEW forums located at this location. NOTICE! The old is a read-only archive.Ĭurrently the Search function is inoperative, but we are working on the problem. Did the 67 T-bird have a S-code engine in it? - Mustangsandmore Forum Archive
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |